This implements RFC 9155 by removing support for SHA-1 algorithms:
- we don't advertise them in ClientHello and CertificateRequest
(where supportedSignatureAlgorithms is used directly)
- we don't select them in our ServerKeyExchange and CertificateVerify
(where supportedSignatureAlgorithms filters signatureSchemesForCertificate)
- we reject them in the peer's ServerKeyExchange and CertificateVerify
(where we check against the algorithms we advertised in ClientHello
and CertificateRequest)
Fixes#72883
Change-Id: I6a6a4656e2aafd2c38cdd32090d3d8a9a8047818
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/658216
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
If a ClientHello only supports TLS 1.3, or if a CertificateRequest is
sent after selecting TLS 1.3, we should not advertise TLS 1.2-only
signature_algorithms like PKCS#1 v1.5 or SHA-1.
However, since crypto/x509 still supports PKCS#1 v1.5, and a direct
CertPool match might not care about the signature in the certificate at
all, start sending a separate signature_algorithms_cert extension to
indicate support for PKCS#1 v1.5 and SHA-1 in certificates.
We were already correctly rejecting these algorithms if the peer
selected them in a TLS 1.3 connection.
Updates #72883
Change-Id: I6a6a4656ab60e1b7fb20fdedc32604dc156953ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/658215
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Cleaned up a lot of the plumbing to make it consistently follow this
logic: clone the preference order; filter by user preference; filter by
FIPS policy. There should be no behavior changes.
Updates #71757
Change-Id: I6a6a4656eb02e56d079f0a22f98212275a400000
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/657096
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
Consolidates handling of FIPS 140-3 considerations for the tls package.
Considerations specific to certificates are now handled in tls instead
of x509 to limit the area-of-effect of FIPS as much as possible.
Boringcrypto specific prefixes are renamed as appropriate.
For #69536
Co-authored-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Change-Id: I1b1fef83c3599e4c9b98ad81db582ac93253030b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/629675
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
