Forced the testConfig CurvePreferences to exclude X25519Kyber768Draft00
to avoid bloating the transcripts, but I manually tested it and the
tests all update and pass successfully, causing 7436 insertions(+), 3251
deletions(-).
Fixes#67061
Change-Id: If6f13bca561835777ab0889a490487b7c2366c3c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/586656
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
I initially thought the logic was broken, but writing the test I
realized it was actually very clever (derogative). It was relying on the
outer loop continuing after a supported match without a key share,
allowing a later key share to override it (but not a later supported
match because of the "if selectedGroup != 0 { continue }").
Replaced the clever loop with two hopefully more understandable loops,
and added a test (which was already passing).
We were however not checking that the selected group is in the supported
list if we found it in key shares first. (This was only a MAY.) Fixed.
Fixes#65686
Change-Id: I09ea44f90167ffa36809deb78255ed039a217b6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/586655
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
These were harmless, but added unnecessary verbosity to the code.
This can happen as a result of refactors: for example,
the method sessionState used to return errors in some cases.
Change-Id: I4e6dacc01ae6a49b528c672979f95cbb86795a85
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/528995
Reviewed-by: Leo Isla <islaleo93@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Mengué <olivier.mengue@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
According to RFC 9001 Section 4.2, the client MUST NOT offer any TLS version
older than 1.3.
Fixes#63723.
Change-Id: Ia92f98274ca784e2bc151faf236380af51f699c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/537576
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
We used to inconsistently run certificate verification on the server on
resumption, but not on the client. This made TLS 1.3 resumption pretty
much useless, as it didn't save bytes, CPU, or round-trips.
This requires serializing the verified chains into the session ticket,
so it's a tradeoff making the ticket bigger to save computation (and for
consistency).
The previous behavior also had a "stickyness" issue: if a ticket
contained invalid certificates, they would be used even if the client
had in the meantime configured valid certificates for a full handshake.
We also didn't check expiration on the client side on resumption if
InsecureSkipVerify was set. Again for consistency, we do that now.
Also, we used to run VerifyPeerCertificates on resumption even if
NoClientCerts was set.
Fixes#31641
Change-Id: Icc88269ea4adb544fa81158114aae76f3c91a15f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497895
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
There was a bug in TestResumption: the first ExpiredSessionTicket was
inserting a ticket far in the future, so the second ExpiredSessionTicket
wasn't actually supposed to fail. However, there was a bug in
checkForResumption->sendSessionTicket, too: if a session was not resumed
because it was too old, its createdAt was still persisted in the next
ticket. The two bugs used to cancel each other out.
For #60105Fixes#19199
Change-Id: Ic9b2aab943dcbf0de62b8758a6195319dc286e2f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496821
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Another internal change, that allows exposing the new APIs easily in
following CLs.
For #60105
Change-Id: I9c61b9f6e9d29af633f952444f514bcbbe82fe4e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496819
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
This change by itself is useless, because the application has no way to
access or provide SessionStates to crypto/tls, but they will be provided
in following CLs.
For #60105
Change-Id: I8d5de79b1eda0a778420134cf6f346246a1bb296
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496818
Reviewed-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Ever since session ticket key rotation was introduced in CL 9072, we've
been including a prefix in every ticket to identify what key it's
encrypted with. It's a small privacy gain, but the cost of trial
decryptions is also small, especially since the first key is probably
the most frequently used.
Also reissue tickets on every resumption so that the next connection
can't be linked to all the previous ones. Again the privacy gain is
small but the performance cost is small and it comes with a reduction in
complexity.
For #60105
Change-Id: I852f297162d2b79a3d9bf61f6171e8ce94b2537a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496817
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Add a QUICConn type for use by QUIC implementations.
A QUICConn provides unencrypted handshake bytes and connection
secrets to the QUIC layer, and receives handshake bytes.
For #44886
Change-Id: I859dda4cc6d466a1df2fb863a69d3a2a069110d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/493655
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
Message marshalling makes use of BytesOrPanic a lot, under the
assumption that it will never panic. This assumption was incorrect, and
specifically crafted handshakes could trigger panics. Rather than just
surgically replacing the usages of BytesOrPanic in paths that could
panic, replace all usages of it with proper error returns in case there
are other ways of triggering panics which we didn't find.
In one specific case, the tree routed by expandLabel, we replace the
usage of BytesOrPanic, but retain a panic. This function already
explicitly panicked elsewhere, and returning an error from it becomes
rather painful because it requires changing a large number of APIs.
The marshalling is unlikely to ever panic, as the inputs are all either
fixed length, or already limited to the sizes required. If it were to
panic, it'd likely only be during development. A close inspection shows
no paths for a user to cause a panic currently.
This patches ends up being rather large, since it requires routing
errors back through functions which previously had no error returns.
Where possible I've tried to use helpers that reduce the verbosity
of frequently repeated stanzas, and to make the diffs as minimal as
possible.
Thanks to Marten Seemann for reporting this issue.
Fixes#58001
Fixes CVE-2022-41724
Change-Id: Ieb55867ef0a3e1e867b33f09421932510cb58851
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1679436
Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Security TryBots <security-trybots@go-security-trybots.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/468125
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
