mirrors/semver
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/semver/semver.git synced 2025-08-22 22:08:33 +00:00
Code

switch to plural first person pronoun

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Adam Ralph 2020-10-10 20:02:46 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 2f5ef23b3e
commit da15534d35
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
semver.md
View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ specified too loosely, you will inevitably be bitten by version promiscuity
Dependency hell is where you are when version lock and/or version promiscuity
prevent you from easily and safely moving your project forward.
As a solution to this problem, I propose a simple set of rules and
As a solution to this problem, we propose a simple set of rules and
requirements that dictate how version numbers are assigned and incremented.
These rules are based on but not necessarily limited to pre-existing
widespread common practices in use in both closed and open-source software.
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ affecting the API increment the patch version, backwards compatible API
additions/changes increment the minor version, and backwards incompatible API
changes increment the major version.
I call this system "Semantic Versioning." Under this scheme, version numbers
We call this system "Semantic Versioning." Under this scheme, version numbers
and the way they change convey meaning about the underlying code and what has
been modified from one version to the next.
@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ Software that explicitly depends on the same dependencies as your package
should have their own dependency specifications and the author will notice any
conflicts. Determining whether the change is a patch level or minor level
modification depends on whether you updated your dependencies in order to fix
a bug or introduce new functionality. I would usually expect additional code
a bug or introduce new functionality. We would usually expect additional code
for the latter instance, in which case it's obviously a minor level increment.
### What if I inadvertently alter the public API in a way that is not compliant with the version number change (i.e. the code incorrectly introduces a major breaking change in a patch release)?