0
0
mirror of https://github.com/semver/semver.git synced 2025-08-25 23:35:30 +00:00

Reword scenario of accidental breaking changes

Alternate proposal to #93. This fixes #38
This commit is contained in:
Haacked 2013-05-31 16:53:15 -07:00
parent 7a8bae9101
commit ff4fb481f6

View File

@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ modification depends on whether you updated your dependencies in order to fix
a bug or introduce new functionality. I would usually expect additional code
for the latter instance, in which case it's obviously a minor level increment.
### What should I do if the bug that is being fixed returns the code to being compliant with the public API (i.e. the code was incorrectly out of sync with the public API documentation)?
### What if I inadvertently alter the public API in a way that is not compliant with the version number change (i.e. the code incorrectly introduces a major breaking change in a patch release)
Use your best judgment. If you have a huge audience that will be drastically
impacted by changing the behavior back to what the public API intended, then