feat(vm2): add initial support for `cdrom`
This is a breaking change comparing to v1 - switching the cdrom schema from a nested block to a nested attribute map.
Improvements comparing to v1:
- support for `ide`, `sata`, `scsi` interfaces
- support for multiple cdroms
Signed-off-by: Pavel Boldyrev <627562+bpg@users.noreply.github.com>
* misc(vm2): add support for `vga`
* fix: use random VM IDs in parallel acc tests
---------
Signed-off-by: Pavel Boldyrev <627562+bpg@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(cluster): Implement initial support for "hardware mappings"
Right now it is alredy possible to use a mapped resource [1], but there
is no dedicated `proxmox_virtual_environment_cluster_hardware_mapping`
resource but this step must still be done manually (or automated through
other ways that interact with the Proxmox API).
This commit implements support for "hardware mapping" resources and data
sources for the, currently, available bus types PCI and USB, based on
the Proxmox VE API documentations [2].
There are some "specialities" in these resources and data sources:
1. The Proxmox VE API attribute, but this implementations names it
"comment" since this naming is generally across the Proxmox VE web UI
and API documentations. This still follows the Terraform
"best practices" [3] as it improves the user experience by matching
the field name to the naming used in the human-facing interfaces.
2. Like in point 1, the name of the attribute of "node checks
diagnostics" for USB hardware mappings is "errors" in the Proxmox VE
API while it is "checks" for hardware mappings of type PCI.
The second naming pattern is also generally used across the
Proxmox VE web UI and API documentations, including the "check_node"
attribute that is also implemented in the
"proxmox_virtual_environment_hardware_mappings" data source.
Therefore, this implementation named both attributes "checks" which
still follows the Terraform "best practices" [3] as it improves the
user experience by matching the field name to the naming used in the
human-facing interfaces.
3. This implmenetation comes with the "unique" feature of allowing
comments (named "descriptions" by the Proxmox VE API) for an entry in
a device map which is not possible through the web UI at all but only
adding a comment for the whole mapping entry instead.
Note that this implementation also adds another point in the
"Known Issues" documentation since it is only possible to map a
PCI/USB device using the `root` PAM account, but this is still better
than having to manually configure it through the web UI or by
interacting with the Proxmox VE API on other ways.
[1]: https://github.com/bpg/terraform-provider-proxmox/pull/500
[2]: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/api-viewer/#/cluster/mapping/pci
[3]: https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/plugin/best-practices/hashicorp-provider-design-principles#resource-and-attribute-schema-should-closely-match-the-underlying-api
Signed-off-by: Sven Greb <development@svengreb.de>
* fix linter
Signed-off-by: Pavel Boldyrev <627562+bpg@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Sven Greb <development@svengreb.de>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Boldyrev <627562+bpg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pavel Boldyrev <627562+bpg@users.noreply.github.com>
